krAzykrAkr forum

*
 
  Home Help Search Login Register  
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
05/20/12 @ 19:52

Login with username, password and session length
Search:
    Advanced search
the kraziest forum to ever hit the planet!!
2237 Posts in 248 Topics by 16 Members
Latest Member: katlinfrench
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: No Death Penalty for Child Rape  (Read 771 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
krAzykrAkr01
Darth Unix
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Posts: 1197


Feel the POWER of the darkside!!!


WWW
« on: 06/26/08 @ 00:47 »

Justices Bar Death Penalty for the Rape of a Child

Quote
WASHINGTON — The death penalty is unconstitutional as a punishment for the rape of a child, a sharply divided Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday.

The 5-to-4 decision overturned death penalty laws in Louisiana and five other states. The only two men in the country who have been sentenced to death for the crime of child rape, both in Louisiana, will receive new sentences of life without parole.

The court went beyond the question in the case to rule out the death penalty for any individual crime — as opposed to “offenses against the state,” like treason or espionage — “where the victim’s life was not taken.”

Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, writing for the majority, said there was “a distinction between intentional first-degree murder on the one hand and nonhomicide crimes against individual persons,” even “devastating” crimes like the rape of a child, on the other.

Quote
Justice Kennedy said on Wednesday that while the court’s death penalty jurisprudence “remains sound,” it should not be expanded to cover a crime for which no one has been executed in the United States for the past 44 years.

Quote
The case, Kennedy v. Louisiana, No. 07-343, was an appeal by one of the two Louisiana inmates, Patrick Kennedy. He was convicted and sentenced to death in 2003 for raping his 8-year-old stepdaughter, whose injuries were severe enough to require emergency surgery. The Louisiana Supreme Court upheld Mr. Kennedy’s conviction and rejected his challenge to the constitutionality of his sentence.

The United States Supreme Court prohibited capital punishment for rape in a 1977 case, Coker v. Georgia in which the victim, while only 16 years old, was married and had the legal status of an adult. It was not clear at the time whether that decision was limited to the rape of an adult woman, or whether it barred the death penalty for any rape.

Quote
The Louisiana law extending the death penalty to the rape of children under the age of 12 dates to 1995. The states that followed were Georgia, Montana, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Texas. Unlike Louisiana, those states all require that a defendant have a previous rape conviction or some other aggravating factor in order to be subject to the death penalty, and no one has yet been sentenced to death under any of the laws.

Justice Kennedy said there was thus a national consensus against applying capital punishment for the crime.

Quote
In a dissenting opinion, Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. sharply disputed this conclusion. He said that because many judges and lawyers had interpreted the 1977 Coker decision as barring capital punishment for any rape, state legislatures “have operated under the ominous shadow” of that decision “and thus have not been free to express their own understanding of our society’s standards of decency.”

The fact that six states in modern times have nonetheless enacted such laws, Justice Alito said, “might represent the beginning of a new evolutionary line” that “would not be out of step with changes in our society’s thinking since Coker was decided.” He said there were abundant indications that society had become more aware of and concerned about sex crimes against children.

Those who voted with Justice Kennedy in the majority were Justice Stevens and Justices David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. joined the dissent, along with Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas.
Logged

krAzykrAkr01
Linux Registered User
Krazy Krakr Korner

"I don't really care what Kermit the Frog said to Bugs Bunny. They are fictional characters. So please don't tell me what jesus said about god."
buckshot
Sr. Member
****
Offline Posts: 236



WWW
« Reply #1 on: 06/26/08 @ 10:12 »

And your opinion is?

Fact is those offenders suffer more living out years in prison as opposed to the state murdering them.  Also, if preserved we can study their behavior and that's easier to do if they are living.

Besided, it costs tax payers more to execute them than to warehouse them for life.
Logged
krAzykrAkr01
Darth Unix
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Posts: 1197


Feel the POWER of the darkside!!!


WWW
« Reply #2 on: 06/26/08 @ 10:19 »

And your opinion is?

Fact is those offenders suffer more living out years in prison as opposed to the state murdering them.  Also, if preserved we can study their behavior and that's easier to do if they are living.

Besided, it costs tax payers more to execute them than to warehouse them for life.

My opinion is that it is probably worth it to spend the extra money and get rid of these people. It is most likely that they will never be a fruitful part of society. To know that you could die because of your actions is a hell of a deterrent.
Logged

krAzykrAkr01
Linux Registered User
Krazy Krakr Korner

"I don't really care what Kermit the Frog said to Bugs Bunny. They are fictional characters. So please don't tell me what jesus said about god."
buckshot
Sr. Member
****
Offline Posts: 236



WWW
« Reply #3 on: 06/26/08 @ 11:53 »

A lot of people agree with you...
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
  
Jump to: